<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: October 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glocalyouthvision.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/october-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glocalyouthvision.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/october-2008/</link>
	<description>A Newsletter for Youth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 11:36:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JTankers</title>
		<link>http://glocalyouthvision.wordpress.com/2008/09/30/october-2008/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>JTankers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glocalyouthvision.wordpress.com/?p=84#comment-202</guid>
		<description>I believe your article is in error.

Contrary to public relations statements from CERN and CERN scientists who are under information censorship directives[7], opposition scientist concerns are credible[6], safety is unknown. 

Dr. Habil. Rainer Plaga[1] is an astrophysicists arguably more competent to assess safety arguments based on stable astronomical bodies than particle physicists. Dr. Plaga proposes risk mitigation measures including suggestions that CERN slow down[1], CERN&#039;s response is to speed up, some would argue recklessly. 

Visiting professor of physics famous for his many significant contributions to science including invention of Chaos theory&#039;s Rössler attractor, founder of Endophysicis and contributor to micro relativity, Dr. Otto Rössler is concerned that CERN is focused on public relations and propaganda while claiming safety based on disputed assumptions.[2]

Objectivity and sanity is needed.[3]

LHCFacts.org

 [1] arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.1415v1.pdf On the potential catastrophic risk from metastable quantum-black holes produced at particle colliders - Dr. Habil. Rainer Plaga Rebuttal (2008)

 [2] www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf A Rational and Moral and Spiritual Dilemma - Otto E. Rössler (2008)

 [3] www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/09/10/do1005.xml, We must be wary of scientific research, Gerald Warner Telegraph.co.uk, (10 Sep 2008)

 [4] www.lhcfacts.org/?p=72 CERN?s Dr. Ellis tells only half of the story - LHCFacts.org (2008)

 [5] www.cambridgeblog.org/tag/shahn-majid/ Particle Accelerators, CERN, and Doomsday. Prof Shahn Majid (2008)

 [6] www.reason.com/news/show/128492.html A 1-in-1,000 Chance of Götterdämmerung, Will European physicists destroy the world? Ronald Bailey &#124; September 2, 2008

 [7] www.lhcdefense.org/pdf/Sancho%20v%20Doe%20-%20Affidavit%20of%20Luis%20Sancho.pdf AFFIDAVIT OF LUIS SANCHO IN UPPORT OF TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (2008)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe your article is in error.</p>
<p>Contrary to public relations statements from CERN and CERN scientists who are under information censorship directives[7], opposition scientist concerns are credible[6], safety is unknown. </p>
<p>Dr. Habil. Rainer Plaga[1] is an astrophysicists arguably more competent to assess safety arguments based on stable astronomical bodies than particle physicists. Dr. Plaga proposes risk mitigation measures including suggestions that CERN slow down[1], CERN&#8217;s response is to speed up, some would argue recklessly. </p>
<p>Visiting professor of physics famous for his many significant contributions to science including invention of Chaos theory&#8217;s Rössler attractor, founder of Endophysicis and contributor to micro relativity, Dr. Otto Rössler is concerned that CERN is focused on public relations and propaganda while claiming safety based on disputed assumptions.[2]</p>
<p>Objectivity and sanity is needed.[3]</p>
<p>LHCFacts.org</p>
<p> [1] arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/0808/0808.1415v1.pdf On the potential catastrophic risk from metastable quantum-black holes produced at particle colliders &#8211; Dr. Habil. Rainer Plaga Rebuttal (2008)</p>
<p> [2] <a href="http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.wissensnavigator.com/documents/spiritualottoeroessler.pdf</a> A Rational and Moral and Spiritual Dilemma &#8211; Otto E. Rössler (2008)</p>
<p> [3] <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/09/10/do1005.xml" rel="nofollow">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/09/10/do1005.xml</a>, We must be wary of scientific research, Gerald Warner Telegraph.co.uk, (10 Sep 2008)</p>
<p> [4] <a href="http://www.lhcfacts.org/?p=72" rel="nofollow">http://www.lhcfacts.org/?p=72</a> CERN?s Dr. Ellis tells only half of the story &#8211; LHCFacts.org (2008)</p>
<p> [5] <a href="http://www.cambridgeblog.org/tag/shahn-majid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cambridgeblog.org/tag/shahn-majid/</a> Particle Accelerators, CERN, and Doomsday. Prof Shahn Majid (2008)</p>
<p> [6] <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/128492.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.reason.com/news/show/128492.html</a> A 1-in-1,000 Chance of Götterdämmerung, Will European physicists destroy the world? Ronald Bailey | September 2, 2008</p>
<p> [7] <a href="http://www.lhcdefense.org/pdf/Sancho%20v%20Doe%20-%20Affidavit%20of%20Luis%20Sancho.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.lhcdefense.org/pdf/Sancho%20v%20Doe%20-%20Affidavit%20of%20Luis%20Sancho.pdf</a> AFFIDAVIT OF LUIS SANCHO IN UPPORT OF TRO AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
